
Rex says
Everyday utility math — the kind you'd otherwise pull up four browser tabs for. I keep it to one clean answer.
Try a scenario
Click to load — tweak from there.Inputs
Result
Adjusted annual production
12,000
Annual production lost vs ideal
0
Total derate percentage
0.0%

Psst — share this and help Rex grow
One click, a permanent link with your numbers baked in.
How to use this
- 1Enter production at ideal south-facing, optimal tilt (kWh/yr).
- 2Enter roof-facing direction.
- 3Enter tilt vs ideal for your latitude.
- 4Read your adjusted annual production on the right — it updates as you type.
- 5Hit Share to keep the scenario or send it to someone.
About this calculator
Not every roof faces true south at the ideal tilt, and that costs real production. This calculator applies standard production-factor derates for azimuth (compass direction the roof faces) and tilt angle relative to your latitude, based on published solar-industry production tables, so you can see the percentage hit before committing to a specific roof plane. East- and west-facing arrays typically lose 15-20% versus true south; a flat or steep-mismatched tilt loses a smaller but real amount. This is the input that should feed directly into the solar array sizing tool if your roof isn't a simple south-facing plane.
Worked example
Using the values the calculator loads with:
Inputs
- Production at ideal south-facing, optimal tilt: 12000 kWh/yr
- Roof-facing direction: South
- Tilt vs ideal for your latitude: Within 10° of ideal
Results
- Adjusted annual production: 12,000
- Annual production lost vs ideal: 0
- Total derate percentage: 0.0%
What each field means
Inputs
- Production at ideal south-facing, optimal tilt (kWh/yr)
- The production at ideal south-facing, optimal tilt used in the calculation, measured in kWh/yr. Starts at 12000 kWh/yr so you have a working example on load.
- Roof-facing direction
- Pick the option that matches your situation — the maths changes per option. Choices: South, Southeast / Southwest, East / West, Northeast / Northwest, North.
- Tilt vs ideal for your latitude
- Pick the option that matches your situation — the maths changes per option. Choices: Within 10° of ideal, 10-20° off ideal, Flat roof / low-slope (<10°), Very steep (>45°) or vertical wall mount.
Results
- Adjusted annual production
- Returned as a whole number and shown as the headline result. It recalculates instantly whenever you change an input, so you can compare scenarios without reloading.
- Annual production lost vs ideal
- Returned as a whole number. It recalculates instantly whenever you change an input, so you can compare scenarios without reloading.
- Total derate percentage
- Returned as a percentage. It recalculates instantly whenever you change an input, so you can compare scenarios without reloading.
FAQ
Is east/west really that much worse than south?
Yes, roughly 15-20% lower annual production in most US latitudes, though the difference matters less than it used to because panel costs have dropped — many installers now happily use a full east/west roof (splitting panels across both slopes) since it's often the only usable roof space, just sized about 15-20% larger to compensate.
What's the ideal tilt for my location?
As a rule of thumb, tilt roughly equal to your latitude maximizes annual production; a few degrees flatter favors summer production, a few degrees steeper favors winter. Most roof pitches (4/12 to 8/12, roughly 18-34°) fall close enough to optimal for most of the continental US that this isn't usually the biggest factor — azimuth matters more.
Should I avoid a north-facing roof entirely?
In the Northern Hemisphere, yes if you have any other option — a north-facing array can lose 40-45% of potential production, which usually makes the economics much weaker. Ground-mount systems, which let you choose ideal azimuth and tilt regardless of roof shape, become worth strongly considering if your only usable roof plane faces north.
Do these derate factors already account for shading?
No — this tool only covers orientation (azimuth) and tilt geometry. Shading from trees, chimneys, or neighboring structures is a separate, often larger loss that needs a site-specific shading analysis (a Solar Pathfinder or installer's shading report), not a generic table.
Accuracy and limitations
- Estimates assume standard, average conditions — local rules, pricing, and materials vary.
- Results are rounded for readability; add a buffer before ordering, booking, or committing.
- Double-check anything with a real cost attached against a local quote.
Related tools
Cite this calculator
Writing about this topic? Grab a citation — every link helps keep these tools free.
RevenueLab. (2026). Roof Orientation & Tilt Solar Derate Calculator. Retrieved from https://www.revenuelab.fyi/toolbox/roof-orientation-derate
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.revenuelab.fyi/toolbox/roof-orientation-derate" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Roof Orientation & Tilt Solar Derate Calculator — RevenueLab</a> (2026).</p>
Source: [Roof Orientation & Tilt Solar Derate Calculator — RevenueLab](https://www.revenuelab.fyi/toolbox/roof-orientation-derate) (2026).
