Consistency is the scarce half
Most people score higher on perseverance than on consistency, because working hard on a current project is common while staying with the same goal for five years is not. If your consistency items are much lower, the constraint is goal selection and switching costs, not effort.
- • Perseverance overlaps heavily with conscientiousness
- • Grit predicts completion of hard, long programmes more than raw achievement
- • Effect sizes are real but smaller than early popular coverage implied
When grit is the wrong answer
Persistence at a goal that no longer fits is sunk-cost behaviour with better branding. The research literature has increasingly emphasised goal disengagement as an equally important skill — people who can drop unattainable goals and re-invest elsewhere show better well-being than people who cannot.
FAQ
What is a good grit score?
On this 0–32 version, 21 and above is high. The subscale split is more informative than the total.
Does grit predict success?
It predicts persistence through demanding programmes reasonably well. Later meta-analyses found the effect on performance is modest and overlaps substantially with conscientiousness.
Can grit be developed?
Perseverance responds to practice structure, feedback, and purpose. Consistency of interest is harder and largely comes from finding a goal worth sticking with.
How this calculator is built
Independently maintained
Written by Sam Doshi and the RevenueLab editorial team. We don't sell the data feeds this tool is built on.
Sourced from primary data
Benchmarks come from public AdSense / Stripe / IRS disclosures and reader-submitted data — never third-party "$X per view" claims. Full methodology.
Last editorial review
Reviewed on a rolling quarterly cycle. Dated reviews are published on the methodology record for each calculator.
Editorial standards
See our editorial policy and disclaimer. Results are estimates, not advice.