← All answers
Helpful?

Is renting really throwing money away compared with buying?

Short answer

No. Owners also pay unrecoverable costs — mortgage interest, property tax, insurance, maintenance and transaction fees. On a $420,000 home at 6.5%, those unrecoverable costs run about $2,900/mo in year one, more than the $2,200 comparable rent.

Unrecoverable costs: owner vs renter, year one

CostOwnerRenter
Mortgage interest≈$2,040/mo—
Property tax + insurance + maintenance≈$893/mo—
Rent—$2,200/mo
Buying closing costs (spread over 7 yrs)≈$150/mo—
Total unrecoverable≈$3,080/mo$2,200/mo

How to read this table

Context

This is the '5% rule' logic popularised by Ben Felix: an owner's unrecoverable costs are roughly property tax (~1%) + maintenance (~1%) + cost of capital (~3%) ≈ 5% of value per year. If rent is below 5% of the price ÷ 12, renting is competitive.

What moves this number

Financing terms

Rate, down payment and amortisation drive cash-on-cash return more than purchase price does. The same building can cash-flow or bleed depending on the loan.

True operating expense ratio

Management, insurance, tax, maintenance, vacancy and capital reserve typically consume 35–50% of gross rent. Models that skip reserves overstate returns badly.

Vacancy and turnover

One 45-day vacancy plus a turn can erase a year of thin cash flow. Underwrite 5–8% vacancy even in tight markets.

Local regulation

Rent rules, short-term rental caps and licensing requirements change the achievable revenue of an identical property between neighbouring cities.

Methodology

Assumptions (all editable in the calculators): $420,000 home (≈2025 US median, NAR), 10% down, 6.5% 30-year fixed (Freddie Mac PMMS range), 3.5%/yr appreciation and rent growth (long-run FHFA HPI / CPI shelter), 1.1% property tax, 1% maintenance, $1,900/yr insurance, 3% buy and 6% sell costs, 6%/yr investment return. Excludes mortgage interest deduction, capital-gains tax and PMI.

Assumptions and caveats

Frequently asked questions

Is renting really throwing money away compared with buying?

No. Owners also pay unrecoverable costs — mortgage interest, property tax, insurance, maintenance and transaction fees. On a $420,000 home at 6.5%, those unrecoverable costs run about $2,900/mo in year one, more than the $2,200 comparable rent.

Which option pays the most in the unrecoverable costs: owner vs renter, year one table?

Total unrecoverable, at ≈$3,080/mo ($2,200/mo). That row represents the strongest case in this dataset, so use it as an upper bound rather than an expectation.

What is a realistic low-end figure?

Buying closing costs (spread over 7 yrs) at ≈$150/mo (—). Plan your costs so the low end still works, then treat anything above it as upside.

Why do the numbers vary so much?

The spread between the highest and lowest row is about 21×. Financing terms and true operating expense ratio explain most of that gap — see the drivers section above for the full list.

Where do these numbers come from?

Assumptions (all editable in the calculators): $420,000 home (≈2025 US median, NAR), 10% down, 6.5% 30-year fixed (Freddie Mac PMMS range), 3.5%/yr appreciation and rent growth (long-run FHFA HPI / CPI shelter), 1.1% property tax, 1% maintenance, $1,900/yr insurance, 3% buy and 6% sell costs, 6%/yr investment return. Excludes mortgage interest deduction, capital-gains tax and PMI.

How can I estimate my own number instead of using a benchmark?

Use the Rent vs Buy Net Worth Calculator on RevenueLab — it takes your own inputs and returns a figure specific to your setup, which is always more accurate than a published range.

Model your own numbers

Related reading

More answers in this category

Looking for a calculator?

Search every free tool on RevenueLab — or describe your problem and Rex will pick one.

Last updated 2026-10-01.